Legal Opinion

Csanyi v. Csanyi

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 30, 1921PublishedCited by 14 opinions

On final hearing ex parte on master’s, report in divorce.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

This is a suit for divorce for desertion. The defendant did not answer and the case was referred to a special master who took depositions and filed an adverse report. The petitioner excepts, filing three several exceptions when only one should have been filed. See McCauley v. McCauley, 88 N. J. Eq. 392; also Byrne v. Byrne, 93 N. J. Eq. 5. A proper exception may be spelled out of the third and last one pleaded by the petitioner.

The petition in this case alleges constructive desertion, counting upon extreme cruelty, which is abundantly proved. For a better understanding of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nurdlinger v. Irvine ex rel. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Machado v. MachadoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  2. Harrington v. HarringtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  3. Lehmann v. LehmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Succhierelli v. SucchierelliNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  5. Reynolds v. ReynoldsMontana Supreme Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API