United States v. Aleman
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1DissentCrawford, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s refusal to apply this Court’s longstanding precedent. See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 45 M.J. 389, 394 (C.A.A.F.1996) (the majority rejected appellant’s argument challenging the anti-union statute, 10 U.S.C. § 976, and noted that “[a]n alternative ground for upholding appellant’s conviction would be to affirm the conviction for an offense closely related to the offense charged”); United States v. Epps, 25 M.J. 319 (C.M.A.1987)(upheld guilty plea for closely related offense). There is not a “substantial basis” in law or fact to set aside the plea…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. AlemanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006