Commonwealth v. Winter
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther, J.,
Defendant was convicted of arson and has appealed from the refusal of his motion for a new trial. The Commonwealth’s evidence was. circumstantial, and consisted, inter alia, of a signed confession and evidence that defendant committed a prior crime which purported to show motive and a plan. This appeal is predicated on the contention that such evidence was inadmissible until the Commonwealth had proven the corpus' delicti.
Defendant was accused of setting fire to a barn on the property of his two aunts. In order to indicate a motive, the Commonwealth introduced evidence…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TurzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. DolphSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HorvathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. DeWanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.