Legal Opinion

Wing v. Wing

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 23, 1948No. 4-8437PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

The primary question is whether Chancery Court had power to direct sale of real property for reinvestment while there was possibility that remaindermen not in being might take.

When D. J. Burnham executed his will in 1924 Martha Overturf, a daughter, was made principal devisee and legatee. Direction was that all property, both real and personal, (subject to certain bequests not here involved) should go to Martha for life, and then to the heirs of her body; “. . . but if she shall die without issue living at her death, then I give such remainder to my nephews and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gavin v. CurtinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hardy v. HiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Bedford v. BedfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  2. Wigal v. HensleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Walker v. BlaneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Young v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Ball v. CurtisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API