Legal Opinion

John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1992No. 90-16651PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

974 F.2d 1050

23 Fed.R.Serv.3d 922

John C. McGUCKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Dr. SMITH, et al.; John C. Medlen, Dr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-16651.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 8, 1991*.

Decided Aug. 24, 1992.

John C. McGuckin, pro se.

Bruce L. Skolnik, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellee.

Tom Slutes, Slutes, Sakrison, Even, Grant & Pelander, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.

Before: POOLE, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

1

John McGuckin,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Shorter v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. (PC) Alford v. SchumakerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (PC) Angel Ruiz v. FortuneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PC) Antonio Perez v. PhiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (PC) Burghardt v. BorgesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API