Legal Opinion

Hifler v. Calmac Oil & Gas Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1939PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

The action is brought to impress a trust upon certain oil and gas leases in the hands of various defendants in favor of Calmac Oil and Gas Corporation, of which plaintiffs are stockholders.

A motion to dismiss a former complaint was made by defendant New Penn Development Corporation, which was granted with leave to the plaintiffs to serve a second amended complaint; that appears to have been served upon and accepted by all of the defendants, and is the pleading to which each of the present motions is addressed. In so far as concerns the defendants Godfrey L. Cabot, Inc., Richard M. Atwater,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Scheuer v. ScheuerNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Sachs v. Cluett, Peabody & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  4. Sialkot Importing Corp. v. BerlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. In re Estate of DowNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API