Legal Opinion

Hume & Warwick Co. v. Condon

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Summers County. Bill by Hume & Warwick Company against E. M Con-don and others. Decree for plaintiffs, and defendants ' appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Dent, Judge:

W. W. Hume, John Warwick, and H. A. Mosely, partners in business under the firm name and style of Hume & Warwick Company, filed their bill in chancery against E. M. Condon and Sue Condon, his wife, and W. A. Garland, in the circuit court of Summers county, alleging therein “that on the 3d day of October, 1894, the defendant E. M. Condon executed a certain promissory note, negotiable and payable one day after the date thereof, at the deposit bank of Pearce, Fant & Co., Fleming-sburg, Ky., to one W. A. Garland, for the sum of six hundred dollars;” “that the said W. A. Garland…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunter's Ex'rs v. HunterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cochran v. ParisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  2. Hale v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Enslow v. SligerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Waddell v. McComasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Adams v. IrwinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API