Legal Opinion

Snug Harbor Packing Co. v. Miller

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided August 12, 1954No. A-9973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

The original parties to this suit occupied the opposite roles in Miller v. Snug Harbor Packing Co., D.C., 121 F. Supp. 939. There the defendant in the instant case sought to enjoin the present plaintiff from continuing -the construction of its fish trap in a manner which allegedly would interfere with or prevent the construction of its fish trap. The court held that under the doctrine of Canoe Pass Packing Co. v. U. S., 9 Cir., 270 F. 533, the right to fish did not accrue until the opening of the season and that therefore the only right which can be interfered with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canoe Pass Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  2. Miller v. Snug Harbor Packing Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SNUG HARBOR PACKING COMPANY v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Clucas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  3. Schlagel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API