Legal Opinion
(PC) Trammel v. Ramos
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 14, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01111Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEMARION TRAMMEL, No. 2:23-cv-1111 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 A. RAMOS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Currently, before the court are defendants’ 18 motion to stay (ECF No. 43) and plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 56). 19 I. Procedural History 20 Two days before the deadline to file dispositive motions, defendants filed a motion to stay 21 these proceedings pending the resolution of plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.