Legal Opinion

Dahl v. The S.S. Amigo

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided March 20, 1962No. 2692PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, District Judge.

This is a cause of action brought by the libelants, Karl Dahl and Hjalmar Wiik, for wages, for damages as a result of a breach of the contract of employment, for penalty wages as provided by Title 46 U.S.C.A. § 596, for subsistence and repatriation expenses; and on behalf of libelant, Karl Dahl, who became ill while awaiting repatriation, for maintenance and cure.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The libelants both signed one-year contracts of employment with the master of the SS AMIGO, Otto Henrichsen, in Bergen, Norway, on November 15, 1958. The contracts provided…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The Fletero v. AriasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  2. Mavromatis v. United Greek Shipowners CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
  3. The Sonderborg.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  4. Forster v. Oro Navigation CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  5. Mandelin v. KenneallyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Redman v. Department of EducationAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. James W. Swain, Jr. v. Isthmian Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  3. Caribbean Federation Lines v. Karl Dahl and Hjalmar WiikCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Ventiadis v. CJ THIBODEAUX & COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API