Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Steele

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1994No. 18077Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMiller, Chief Justice

But for the appallingly lax procedure under which Steele was bonded out of jail after his second arrest, the tragic events of January 4, 1992, would probably never have occurred.

Steele was arrested shortly after 1:00 a.m. when a co-worker at Studio One, his place of employment, called the police and reported he was creating a disturbance. After being led outside by a customer, Steele returned and threatened to rape the co-worker. He went back outside, was seen urinating on a parked vehicle and was arrested for public indecency. He was booked into jail at 1:27 a.m. and, after posting a $50.00…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. The People v. NichollsIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. United States v. Charles A. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Robert Donald SpletzerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Wyman Hulan Parr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API