Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 24, 1992No. Docket Nos. 20452-87, 20453-87, 20459-87, 20460-87, 20461-87, 20520-87, 15261-88Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER I. AND PATRICIA A. PHILLIPS, ET AL., 1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Phillips v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 20452-87, 20453-87, 20459-87, 20460-87, 20461-87, 20520-87, 15261-88

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1992-175; 1992 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 186; 63 T.C.M. (CCH) 2517;

March 24, 1992, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

John L. Brennan and Patrick J. Regan, for petitioners.

C. Glenn McLaughlin and David L. Jordan, for respondent.

WHALEN

WHALEN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

WHALEN, Judge: Respondent determined the following deficiencies in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Borchers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990
  2. Richard J. Borchers Jane E. Borchers v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. Ragnar v. Hokanson and Marilyn L. Hokanson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Bloomberg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  5. Albert E. Schumacher and Eunice A. Schumacher v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API