Legal Opinion · Dissent

Snead v. Bonnoil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1900Published

Appeal by the defendant, Maurice Bonnoil, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 2d day of May, 1899, upon the verdict of a jury for $500, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 8th day of May, 1899, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Dissent

Ingraham, J. (dissenting):

I am unable to concur in the affirmance of this judgment. The action is for false imprisonment, the charge against the defendants being that they (the defendants) “ Maliciously and with intent to • injure the plaintiff by force compelled plaintiff to go with them to the Central Police Office or Headquarters, situate in said city of New York, and there imprisoned this plaintiff, and then and there detained him, restrained of his liberty for the space of forty-eight hours or thereabouts, without reasonable cause and without any right or authority so to do.” The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meserve v. FolsomSupreme Court of Vermont · 1890
  2. Doherty v. MunsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API