People v. Rickard
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLohr, Justice
I agree with the majority that David W. Hackenbach’s disclosure of grand jury information to Yvonne Azar, a member of his prosecutorial staff, did not violate Rule 6.2(a) of the Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure. I also agree that Azar’s disclosure of this information to the defendant, Steven D. Rickard, violated the secrecy of the grand jury. Contrary to the majority, however, I would hold that a breach of grand jury secrecy also occurred when the grand jury investigators confronted Officer Johnson with the news that at least two other grand jury witnesses had testified differently than…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Granbery v. DISTRICT CT. IN & FOR CITY & CTY. OF DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.