Legal Opinion

Conner v. Dake

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1982No. 13888Published

1Opinion of the Court

653 P.2d 1173 (1982)

103 Idaho 761

Kenneth CONNER and Arvilla Conner, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Virgil W. DAKE and Imogene Dake, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 13888.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

September 3, 1982.

Rehearing Denied December 6, 1982.

Michael O. Douglas and Severt Swenson, Jr., Gooding, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Andrew F. James and Cecil D. Hobdey, of James, Hobdey & Varin, Gooding, for defendants-respondents.

BAKES, Chief Justice.

In the proceedings below, judgment was entered against the appellants, and included an award of attorney fees under I.C. § 12-121.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Volk v. BaldazoIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. LaMereIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Payne v. FoleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Odziemek v. WeselyIdaho Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API