Legal Opinion

Beuschel v. Manowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order directing plaintiff and her child to permit the taking of blood for the purpose of determining defendant’s paternity of the child reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied. Plaintiff may submit or not to the taking of her own blood, but it plainly determines nothing. She asserts, and no one would gainsay it, that she is the mother of this child. A blood test of the defendant and the child may possibly determine his non-paternity, but it is not claimed, as we understand the record, that such a blood test would determine the defendant’s paternity. This child is…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Shanks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Beach v. BeachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Bednarik v. BednarikNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  5. Flippen v. MeinholdCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API