Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1933No. 9079PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

“The writ of ne exeat issues to restrain a person from leaving the jurisdiction of the State; and where the principal in a ne exeat bond appears and defends the suit against him for divorce and alimony, and is within the jurisdiction of the court when the final judgment is rendered against him, subject to the processes of the court, such writ becomes functus officio, and upon motion the court should declare the bond canceled and the sureties therein discharged.” May v. May, 146 Ga. 521 (91 S. E. 687); Lomax v. Lomax, 176 Ga. 605.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. W. H. Harris and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lomax v. LomaxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. May v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Shaw v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API