Legal Opinion

Watson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 7, 1988No. 111, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

We granted certiorari in this case to decide whether the trial judge erred in concluding that he had no discretion to exclude the defendant’s prior attempted rape conviction when it was offered for impeachment purposes notwithstanding the fact that the judge found that the conviction’s probative value was outweighed by its prejudicial effect.

The parties have agreed to the following facts. James Watson was charged in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County with rape and lesser included offenses. Prior to his jury trial, Watson asked the court to rule on whether his 1982 Virginia…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  2. Prout v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Kennedy v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Linkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Klauenberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. United States Gypsum Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Beales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API