Legal Opinion

Wilkes v. O'Bryan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 13, 1999No. 43789-5-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Agid, A.C.J.

Annette and Thomas Wilkes executed a community property agreement which purported to vest a “fee simple” estate in the surviving spouse, but also provided that upon the death of the second spouse, the residuary estate should be divided among their melded family of six children. Arguing that community property agreements may be used as will substitutes to pass property to third parties, Thomas’s three children contend that this agreement created a vested remainder in each of them for one-sixth of the Wilkes’ residuary estate. In Bartlett v. Bartlett,1 however, the Washington…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simpson Tacoma Kraft Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Higgins v. StaffordWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re Estates of WahlWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re Dunn's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In Re Gochnour's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stranberg v. LaszCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. Stranberg v. LaszCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. In Re The Estate Of: Leeanna Ruth MickelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API