E. H. Holcomb, Jr. v. Cessna Aircraft Company, and Continental Motors Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Circuit Judge:
Cessna Aircraft Company and Continental Motors Corporation appeal from judgments rendered against them upon jury verdicts in a suit founded upon alleged manufacturers’ defects in a Cessna 310K airplane and its twin engines. As to Continental, we reverse with directions to dismiss the complaint. As to Cessna, we reverse and remand for a new trial as to certain specified items.
I
The Case Against Cessna
In May, 1966, E. H. Holcomb, the owner of a Cessna 310 airplane, contacted Ray Umbough about the purchase of a new Cessna. Umbough suggested that Holcomb write to Skyways Air…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey v. Robbins Coal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- United States Rubber Company v. Eugene BauerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Gloria L. Schrader v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- John Stevenson v. Trw Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Royal Typewriter Company, a Division of Litton Business Systems, Inc., a Corporation v. Xerographic Supplies Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Hartwig Farms, Inc. v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Smith v. ChapmanDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1977
- Bailey v. Monaco Coach Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.