Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Barnhart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 1985No. 979PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This matter comes before us on appeal from judgment of sentence for involuntary manslaughter 1 and endangering the welfare of a child. 2 Appellants’ convictions follow the death of their infant son. The child, Justin Barnhart, age 2 years and 7 months, died as a result of an untreated Wilms’ tumor. Appellants, life-long members of the Faith Taberna cle Church, had relied on God to the exclusion of modern medicine to cure the boy’s cancer. Justin’s death sparked an inquiry. As a result of that investigation, appellants were tried and convicted by a jury on counts of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. TrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. RementerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. WestcottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. State v. Dale R. NeumannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API