Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Hopkins

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 18, 1936No. [No. 24, October Term, 1936.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The sole question properly before the court in thiá case is whether the Orphans’ Court of Harford County acted within its power in passing an order dated May 6th, 1936, purporting to appoint Frederick B. Baldwin a co-administrator pendente lite with Mary J. Baldwin upon the estate of Joseph R. Baldwin, deceased.

The record discloses that on March 10th, 1936, Mary J. Baldwin was appointed administratrix pendente lite upon the estate of her deceased husband, Joseph R. Baldwin, and promptly thereafter furnished the required bond, whereupon letters were issued. Then followed the usual notice to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Horton v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  2. Wingert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Carey v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  4. Dorsey v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  5. Mobley v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barrett v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. Zulver Realty Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Kerby v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Montgomery County Welfare Board v. DonnallyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  5. Baldwin v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API