Legal Opinion
In Re McKeyes' Estate
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1946No. Docket No. 46, Calendar No. 43,347PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
In the estate of Frank H. McKeyes, deceased, numerous claims were allowed in the probate court of Yan Burén county. On appeal to the circuit court certain of such claims were allowed, and Grace M.'Brown, an heir-at-law of deceased, has appealed. In the main the defenses urged are (1) that the claims were not proven, (2) that they are barred by the statute of limitations, and . (3) that by filing their respective claims in a receivership and receiving partial payment thereon claimants elected an inconsistent remedy and for that reason cannot recover in the instant proceedings.
The inception of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elliott v. Capital City State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Girard Bank v. Bank of Penn TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
- H. G. Vogel Co. v. Original Cabinet Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Burke v. City of River RougeMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- James S. Holden Co. v. ApplebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Palenkas v. Beaumont HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Moll v. County of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Wright v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Landreth v. First National Bank of Cleburne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Trader v. Comerica BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.