Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Morrow v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2008No. WD 67440Published

1ConcurrenceAlok Ahuja, Judge

Although I do not necessarily disagree with what is written in the majority opinion, I believe this case can be decided on somewhat narrower grounds, without addressing all of the issues the majority discusses. I accordingly concur in the result.

To my mind, two provisions of Hallmark’s Dispute Resolution Program, appearing in the policy’s first two pages, defeat its argument that the policy created an enforceable arbitration contract. First, on its opening page the policy states: “This procedure does not change the employment-at-will relationship between the Company and its employees.” On the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sharon Floss v. Ryan's Family Steak Houses, Inc., Kyle Daniels v. Ryan's Family Steak Houses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Gibson v. Neighborhood Health Clinics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Teresita J. Dumais v. American Golf Corporation, Doing Business as Paradise Hills Golf Club, a Foreign Corporation and William WinklerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. Stone Motor Company v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. Morrison v. Amway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API