Smith v. City of Oklahoma City
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1DissentMitchell, J.
19 Because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear Smith's claim for wrongful termination, I respectfully dissent. The central issue in this case is whether Section 8.3 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) entered into between the *927City (Employer) and the Plaintiff's representative Union provides the exclusive procedure for settling employee grievances covered by that agreement. I believe that it does.
1 20 Section 8.3 provides:
Controversy between the Employer and the Bargaining Agent or any other employee concerning the interpretation, enforcement or application…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.