Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hobson v. Hansen

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 9, 1967No. Civ. A. 82-66Published

1Dissent

J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit

Judge (dissenting):

The majority of this three-judge court has decided that 31 D.C.Code, § 101 (1961) is sustained alternatively by the District clause of Article I and the appointments provisions of Article II of the Constitution. I cannot agree. Ordinarily, nullifying an Act of Congress as unconstitutional is a drastic venture. But the institutional considerations which persuade courts to show restraint when asked to intervene in the affairs of the other branches of government largely disappear when the statute under review is one assigning responsibilities to the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API