Foundry Systems & Supply, Inc. v. Industry Development Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
1. Whether an accord and satisfaction defense is available depends on the language of the first action and counterclaim, the release, and the affidavits attached to the motion for summary judgment. The language of the release ("The undersigned hereby acknowledge prior receipt of a copy of this release and that it is notice in writing of the lack of consent of the party or parties released hereby”) is meaningful only in a third-party release situation such as those arising under Code Ann. § 56-408.1 where the consideration for the release is advanced for the benefit of another.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pulley v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Jefferson Mills, Inc. v. GregsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. CreekIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Rayner v. Raytheon Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Parks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Guardianship of B.A.D. v. FinneganMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. HeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.