Legal Opinion

Weysham v. Lodato

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 1971No. Nos. 4548, 4549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOULIG, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Alcide J. Weysham, instituted this proceeding against defendants-appellees, Joseph S. Lodato and Salva-dore A. Lodato, seeking to recover $10,-500.00, the amount alleged to be due and owing to him as his fee as attorney for the Succession of Domenico Lodato, together with legal interest and all costs. Defendants-appellees answered plaintiff’s suit, stated that they had paid plaintiff $3,500.00 to date, denied that they owe plaintiff any further legal fees and prayed that plaintiffs suit be dismissed at his costs. In addition defendants-appellees filed a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rivet v. BattistellaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  2. Succession of PackwoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Moreau v. MoreauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API