Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Department of Taxation

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The appellant’s position may be expressed as follows: Mr. Whitney, although a resident of Wisconsin and a licensed engineer, should not be taxed in Wisconsin on that portion of his income which was not derived from his personal services but which represented earnings from a business having a situs outside of Wisconsin; that it was income from a btisiness is evidenced by the fact that the firm employed a large staff, utilized a significant capital account and required less than 10 percent of Mr. Whitney’s time in professional engineering.

The respondent challenges the claim that this is a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bolier v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. State ex rel. Lerner v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bechert v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Milwaukee County v. DorsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Charles W. Sexton Co. v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Ness v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Schonwetter v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Shelley v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API