Clark v. Roman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Custer County; 3. W. Laivter, Judge. Action by C. A. Roman and another against H. H. Clark. Judgment for plaintiffs, and his motion for an order to vacate it being overruled, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BLEAKMORE, C.
This proceeding in -error is to review an order of the superior court of Custer county overruling a motion to- vacate an alleged void judgment. On April 4, 1910, Roman and Newcomb, real estate brokers, brought suit against H. H. Clark for 8200, alleged to be the stipulated sum due them as commission. They recovered judgment for $100. Motion for new trial was overruled, and the case brought to this court, where the proceeding in error was dismissed, because defendants in error had neither waived nor been served with summons. Mandate was issued and entered of record in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harding v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Phoenix Bridge Co. v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Nicoll Et Ux. v. Midland Savings Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Wheatland Grain & Lumber Co. v. DowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Spies v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wagner v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Chivers v. Board of Com'rs of Johnston CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Chavez v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- McCornack v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Mitchelson v. Commercial Investment TrustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.