Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adams v. GJ Creel and Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 16, 1995No. 24330Published

1DissentToal, Justice

I respectfully dissent believing that this matter should have been submitted to a jury. The basis for this dispute is plaintiff’s contention that Creel used illegal gasoline pricing policies to try to drive Adams out of business.

From 1967-1980, when Adams was a Gulf franchisee, Gulf did not operate its own stations in Horry County. As a franchisee, Adams was sold gasoline by Gulf at the “dealer tankwagon” price, which was more favorable than the price Gulf charged the non-franchisee stations it supplied. In 1980, Creel bought the Adams station property and supply contract from Gulf. Although…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texaco Inc. v. HasbrouckSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Young v. Century Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Jackson v. Atlantic Soft Drink Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API