Legal Opinion

People v. Melovicz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1923No. Docket No. 141PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Defendant was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law and was sentenced in the alternative to pay a fine of $250 or to be confined in the Detroit house of correction for a period of 60 days. He paid the fine' and thereafter sued out this writ of error. In the recent case of People v. Ortwski, 220 Mich. 462, a similar situation was presented. We there held that the judgment having been satisfied by voluntary payment, the writ of error performed no function. That case is controlling here.. The writ of error must be dismissed.

Wiest, C. J., and McDonald, Clark, Bird, Sharpe;. Moore, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. OrtwskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duncan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. State v. OsborneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  3. Thomas v. Montcalm Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. City of Denison v. McCordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. People v. CareyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API