Legal Opinion

Farmers' Savings Bank of Arispe v. Arispe Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 22, 1908Published

Appeal from Union District Court.— Hon. H. K. Evans, Judge. Action at law upon a promissory note. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J. — ■

This action was begun upon a promissory-note purporting to have been made by the Arispe Mercantile Company hy Burr Forbes, president, and Frank Forbes, secretary, payable to the order of Burr Forbes & Son, and indorsed by that firm to the plaintiff bank. To this claim the *247defendants, Forbes & Son, wbo are sued as indorsers, answer, denying any indebtedness tbereon, and alleging that tbe note was never delivered to tbe bank, but placed in its custody for safe-keeping, and was never indorsed by tbe payee therein named. Tbe mercantile company also pleaded substantially tbe same…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Conner v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Winsted Bank v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. University of Des Moines v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Nelson v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Kimball v. BryanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API