Farmers' Savings Bank of Arispe v. Arispe Mercantile Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Union District Court.— Hon. H. K. Evans, Judge. Action at law upon a promissory note. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Weaver, J. — ■
This action was begun upon a promissory-note purporting to have been made by the Arispe Mercantile Company hy Burr Forbes, president, and Frank Forbes, secretary, payable to the order of Burr Forbes & Son, and indorsed by that firm to the plaintiff bank. To this claim the *247defendants, Forbes & Son, wbo are sued as indorsers, answer, denying any indebtedness tbereon, and alleging that tbe note was never delivered to tbe bank, but placed in its custody for safe-keeping, and was never indorsed by tbe payee therein named. Tbe mercantile company also pleaded substantially tbe same…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Conner v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Winsted Bank v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- University of Des Moines v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Nelson v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Kimball v. BryanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.