Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Detenber

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 10, 1997No. A97A0052Published

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Chief Judge.

The McKenzies and Christman, plaintiffs below, appeal from the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment to Detenber on the question of whether an intersection qualified as an unmarked crosswalk for purposes of their negligence suit arising from being struck by Detenber’s car while crossing Pharr Road in Atlanta.1

It is undisputed that Pharr Road runs east and west and is intersected on its south side by Boling Way, which dead ends at Pharr Road, forming a “T” intersection.

We agree with the trial court that this issue is determined by the clear language of OCGA §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. SchroederArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Martin v. HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Conner v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Fan v. BuzzittaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Griffin v. OdumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API