Legal Opinion

LaForce v. Bucklin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 5, 1971No. [No. 243, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We shall here be obliged to interpret a Montgomery County zoning ordinance relative to the permitted height of a building in a commercial zone. We shall affirm the order of the trial judge (Moore, J.) who wrote a very able and comprehensive opinion permitting the construction. We shall also be concerned with the application of Maryland Rule 882 c relative to the Court’s discretion in the assessment of costs, since one party has printed unnecessary material.

As the trial judge observed in his opinion, the property here involved is familiar to this Court, being the same property involved in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohen v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. Montgomery County Board of Appeals v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Operations Research, Inc. v. Davidson & Talbird, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Walsh v. Lewis Swimming Pool Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Martin v. United Slate, Tile & Composition Roofers, Damp & Waterproof Workers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. French v. HinesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API