Legal Opinion

Harmelin v. Michigan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1991No. 89-7272PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

501 U.S. 957 (1991)

HARMELIN

v.

MICHIGAN.

No. 89-7272.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Argued November 5, 1990.

Decided June 27, 1991.

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN.

Carla J. Johnson, by appointment of the Court, 497 U. S. 1022, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Richard Thompson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Michael J. Modelski.[*]

2Judgment of the CourtJustice Scalia

Petitioner was convicted of possessing 672 grams of cocaine and sentenced to a mandatory term of life in prison without possibility of parole.[1] The Michigan Court of Appeals initially reversed his conviction…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent · White; Dissent · Marshall; Dissent · Stevens.

3Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Hubbard (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. PolizziOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. (HC) Torres v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (HC) Tucker v. GasteloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (HC)Kakowski v. PollardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API