Legal Opinion

Young v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 5, 1872PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Case 46 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED Revised Statutes, sec. 17, 2 Stanton, 28; ib.S. Revised Statutes, 1 Stanton, 281. Perry on Trusts, 662. 2 Vesey, 190, Peacock v. Monk. 2 Atkyns, 558, Tyrrell v. Hope. 1 Bro.

Read the full summary

Case 46 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED Revised Statutes, sec. 17, 2 Stanton, 28; ib.S. Revised Statutes, 1 Stanton, 281. Perry on Trusts, 662. 2 Vesey, 190, Peacock v. Monk. 2 Atkyns, 558, Tyrrell v. Hope. 1 Bro. Ch. R. R. 20, Hulme v. Tenant. 2 Met. 521, Toombs v. Stone. 3 Met. 335, Marshall v. Miller. 13 B. Mon. 384, Bell v. Kellar. 16 B. Mon. 486, Burch v. Breckinridge. 18 B. Mon. 382, Williamson v. Williamson. 14 B. Mon. 198, Petty v. Malier. 17 B. Mon. 59. 12 B. Mon. 329. 2 Met. 521. 22 N. Y. 450. 2 Atkyns, 379. 5 Bush, 399. 3 Blaekstone, 417. 3 Met. 244.…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE PRYOR

delivered the opinion oe the court.

Charles Miles died many years since, leaving a last will and testament by which he devised nearly all of his estate to his only child, Mrs. Ann E. Young. John Lancaster, Rev. J. M. Lancaster, and the appellee, E. B. Smith, were made his executors, and also trustees to hold the property for the benefit of his daughter. Some years after the death of the devisor and the marriage of his daughter with Samuel B. Young a controversy originated with the present appellees (Young and wife) and John Lancaster, who alone qualified as executor, in regard to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montjoy v. LashbrookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1842
  2. Young v. Miles' ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1850

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robinson's Ex'rs v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API