Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1889PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Boone Circuit Court. — Hon. G. H. Burckhartt, Judge. (1) The court below erred, in overruling objection number 2. The inventory shows a note due the estate for twenty thousand dollars, and considerable interest. Eleven thousand dollars thereof is charged to the executrix. The balance must be so charged, or satisfactorily accounted for, with interest. This is self-evident, and needs neither authorities nor argument. 73 Mo. 580; 10 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Boone Circuit Court. — Hon. G. H. Burckhartt, Judge. (1) The court below erred, in overruling objection number 2. The inventory shows a note due the estate for twenty thousand dollars, and considerable interest. Eleven thousand dollars thereof is charged to the executrix. The balance must be so charged, or satisfactorily accounted for, with interest. This is self-evident, and needs neither authorities nor argument. 73 Mo. 580; 10 Mo. App. 232. (2) The court erred in overruling objection number 17, because a number of these claims accrued during the lifetime of the decedent, and…

1Opinion of the CourtBrace, J.

At the November term, 1883, of the probate court of Boone county, the respondent, executrix of George R. Jacobs, deceased, filed in said court her account for final settlement, to which the appellants took exceptions, and thereafter filed nineteen objections to the approval of such final settlement, all of which were either abandoned on trial, 'or overruled by the court, except 18 and 19, which were partially sustained, and both parties appealed to the circuit court. The case coming on for trial in the circuit court, the plaintiffs stated “that they abandoned all their exceptions except those…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smyley v. ReeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Estate of Merritt v. MerrittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Pinckard's Distributees v. Pinckard's AdministratorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Loud v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. Estate of Meeker v. SwiftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Matson v. PearsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Langston v. CanterburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. In Re Carlin v. DearmondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API