Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Futtrell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Chief Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

The plaintiff was employed for many years as a coal miner by the Cumberland Coal Company who insured its liability under the Workmen’s Compensation Act with the appellant, Royal Indemnity Company, Inc. In 1972 plaintiff became disabled to continue said employment and brought an action under the workmen’s compensation *584law in the Chancery Court for Knox County seeking benefits for permanent total disability by reason of coal miner’s pneumoco-niosis and at that time, May 27, 1974, the Chancellor adjudicated his disability at 75%…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adams v. American Zinc CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Cates v. T.I.M.E., DC, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Moore v. Old Republic Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Tennessee Products & Chemical Corp. v. ReevesTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. StarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Valles v. Daniel Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Phillips v. Old Republic Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Swanger v. Old Republic Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API