Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peters v. Farmers Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 17, 1987No. 68743Published

1DissentBillings, Judge

Because I agree with the dissenting opinion of Pritchard, J., of the Western District, I dissent from the principal opinion herein and adopt the dissenting opinion, without quotation marks, filed by Judge Pritchard which is as follows:

The declarations on the front pages of each of the two policies of automobile insurance here involved are as follows:

[[Image here]]

Benita M. Peters is a specifically named insured along with her husband, Billy J. Peters, in one policy. She is also a defined named insured by reason of being the spouse of and a resident of the same household of Billy J. Peters who…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cano v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Bellamy v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Garrison v. RynoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Hines v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. Hufft Ex Rel. Browning v. KuhnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API