Klippel v. Mid-Carolina Oil, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment to certain of the respondents. The appellants, B.W. and Suzanne Klippel, sued the individual respondents (respondents) on the basis the respondents had previously employed John Watkins as their personal agent to institute a civil suit against the Klippels. The respondents in the instant action were stockholders of two corporations which sued the Klip-pels in the federal court; they were not parties to that suit.1 The federal suit was resolved in favor of the Klippels. The complaint in the case sub judice alleges…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fuller v. Eastern Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- City of Greenville v. Washington American League Baseball ClubSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Sheppard v. KimbroughCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hodge v. Unihealth Post-Acute Care of Bamberg, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Rim Associates v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Johnson v. LloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012