Legal Opinion

Enfinger v. INTERNATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1987No. 44205, 44249PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certiorari to consider Division 2 of the Court of Appeals opinion on the recovery of prejudgment interest in an action to recover optional insurance benefits for personal injury protection (PIP). The Court of Appeals held that the claim in this case is liquidated and that interest runs from the time demand for payment of benefits is made by the insured until payment is tendered by the insurer, less the thirty-day period provided in OCGA § 33-34-6. Intl. Indemnity Co. v. Enfinger, 181 Ga. App. 420 (352 SE2d 575) (1986). We affirm.

The Court of Appeals relied on their earlier case of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. International Indemnity Co. v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. International Indemnity Co. v. EnfingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rice v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Flynt v. Life of the South Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Holloway v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. v. AFC Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API