Legal Opinion

Zinkewitz v. Cramp

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 1918No. Appeal, No. 185Published

Appeal, No. 185, Oct. T., 1917, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1913, No. 5403, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Zinkewitz v. Cramp. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Patterson, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the circumstances of the accident. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $600. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in overruling defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This is an action for personal injuries by an employee' against his employer. The plaintiff charged the defendant with negligence in failing to provide him with a safe place in which to work. The plaintiff at the time of the injury was a member of a gang of riggers employed in and about the construction of a vessel at defendant’s shipyard. This gang of men worked at different places, as directed by a foreman named Buckley. The plates had been riveted upon the side of the vessel to a height of about twenty feet above the ground and at the time of the accident the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mapes v. Pittsburg Provision & Packing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Garrison v. Armstrong & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Moleskey v. South Fork Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Franczak v. Nazareth Cement Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Broski v. Phœnix Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API