Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1934No. Civ. 9911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

The petitioner having proceeded to trial upon the contest of a will, in which proceeding he was the contestant, after examination of two witnesses, declined to proceed and orally moved for a dismissal without prejudice. The court denied the motion and proceeded with the case and thereafter ordered the will admitted to probate. A writ of prohibition was thereupon sought to restrain further proceedings and to require the superior court to grant such motion.

Relief is- sought by this petition to avoid delay through appeal.

Section 581 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that an action may be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boca & Loyalton R.R. v. Superior Court of Lassen Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Huntington Park Improvement Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Overholser v. GlynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Chapman v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Broadwell v. RyersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Steffens v. RowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API