Perez v. Wegman Companies
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Doerr, J. (dissenting).
I agree with the majority’s conclusion, implicit in the decision, that principles of res judicata do not bar plaintiff’s amended complaint. Plaintiff’s wrongful discharge claims were not dismissed on the merits but, rather, *1011were dismissed based upon their failure to state a valid cause of action under New York law. Consequently, the dismissal should not be given res judicata effect.
I disagree with the majority’s conclusion, however, that plaintiff’s amended complaint, alleging a violation of Labor Law § 740, the so-called "whistle-blower statute”, is time-barred. In my…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kern v. DePaul Mental Health Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Smith v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984