Legal Opinion

Garner v. Garner

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 10, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

This appeal concerns the custody of a twenty-month-old child. The order of the chancellor provides that each parent will have primary custody of the child for alternate six-month periods. On appeal, both parents object to that arrangement. The mother contends that the proof shows that the best interests of the child would be served by placing him in her custody. The father makes the same argument except that he contends that the chancellor should have placed the child with him. We affirm the judgment of the lower court.

The parties were married in November of 1982 and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bah v. BahCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  2. Logan v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  3. Dunavant v. DunavantCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  4. Baggett v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  5. Bush v. BushCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gray v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API