Cherry v. Insull Utility Investments, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
On May 15, 1932, upon a creditor’s bill and answer thereto, the eourt appointed receivers for and took jurisdiction of all assets of the defendant corporation. I shall not recount the detailed facts, but direct attention to the final effect of the proceedings, viz., that by a receivership in- equity the court took into its custody for administration by its receivers all property of the corporation within the district. By the order the corporation, its officers, all creditors, and other parties in interest were restrained from interfering in any way with the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Eric HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Kirby Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1936
- T. H. Mastin & Co. v. Kirby Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1936