Legal Opinion

In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Daniel G.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 2014No. 6862 S-15100PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Daniel G. appeals an ex parte order authorizing a 72-hour psychiatric evaluation issued after his emergency detention. 1 The evaluation personnel determined that Daniel did not meet the statutory criteria for involuntary commitment, and he was released before the expiration of the 72-hour evaluation period. He argues that the evaluation order violated his constitutional right to due process because it was issued on an ex parte basis, without notice and a hearing, while he was safely in protective custody. The superi- or court denied Daniel's motion to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Luciano G.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. In Re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Heather R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Vern H.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Native Village of Kwinhagak v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API