In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Daniel G.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Daniel G. appeals an ex parte order authorizing a 72-hour psychiatric evaluation issued after his emergency detention. 1 The evaluation personnel determined that Daniel did not meet the statutory criteria for involuntary commitment, and he was released before the expiration of the 72-hour evaluation period. He argues that the evaluation order violated his constitutional right to due process because it was issued on an ex parte basis, without notice and a hearing, while he was safely in protective custody. The superi- or court denied Daniel's motion to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
- In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Luciano G.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
- In Re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Heather R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Vern H.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Native Village of Kwinhagak v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.