Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cochran v. Emory University

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 5, 2001No. A01A1058Published

1ConcurrenceMiller, Judge

Although I greatly empathize with the plaintiff’s plight, I am constrained by binding precedent to agree with the trial court’s conclusion that judicial estoppel bars plaintiff’s claim. Ignoring the clear guidance given by this Court in prior decisions, plaintiff’s counsel failed for months to reopen and amend her bankruptcy petition even after she clearly had a cause of action for her injury and after Emory University moved for summary judgment on the grounds of judicial estoppel. Therefore, I feel it is necessary to write separately to emphasize certain points.

*740Two cases are painfully clear…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. PerinoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Reagan v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Harper v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Adams v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API