Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bartholomey v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 4, 1972No. [No. 106, September Term, 1970.] [No. 386, September Term, 1971.] [Misc. No. 2, September Term, 1972.] [Misc. No. 3, September Term, 1972.]Published

September Term, 1970.] September Term, 1971.] September Term, 1972.] September Term, 1972.]

1Dissent

*197 Barnes, J.,

dissenting:

I dissent because, after a careful review of the five opinions of the plurality justices in Furman v. Georgia, 408 U. S. 238, 92 S. Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), I cannot find any holding by the Supreme Court of the United States which requires us to hold or to indicate that the Maryland statutes in regard to capital punishment are unconstitutional under any provisions of the Federal Constitution or which requires us to change, in any way, the death penalties imposed in Bartholomey v. State and in the companion cases referred to in the majority opinion.

I will begin…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API